I’m done pretending this is anything but what it is: in the United States, money and elite status have become a kind of diplomatic immunity from the Epstein scandal, while across the Atlantic, people with comparable power are actually falling. The contrast isn’t just embarrassing; it’s an x‑ray of how thoroughly our own political and legal culture has surrendered to wealth, proximity, and partisan loyalty.
Europe is bleeding; America is shrugging
Look at the basic scoreboard. In Britain, Peter Mandelson — former EU commissioner, cabinet minister, and U.K. ambassador to the U.S. — has been forced out of his ambassador post, then out of the Labour Party, and now faces a misconduct-in-public-office investigation after documents showed him leaking sensitive economic briefings and lobbying on Epstein’s behalf. In Norway, emails and records have triggered a criminal corruption probe into a former prime minister and a humiliating public apology from the crown princess over her relationship with Epstein. These aren’t fringe figures; they’re the kind of people whose portraits hang in government buildings.
European institutions are behaving as if this is an actual scandal, not just a PR problem. Ministers are sacked, royal titles stripped, inquiries launched, and prime ministers are taking heat for appointments that in hindsight look reckless or corrupt. No one is pretending that “we had no idea who he really was” is good enough anymore.
Now look homeward. Here, the DOJ holds a press conference, announces it has released 3.5 million “responsive” pages, and all but declares the case finished — despite a standing subpoena from House Oversight Democrats and credible claims that at least half the total file set is still being withheld. A few people step down (Larry Summers pulls back from public roles, a top law-firm chair resigns) but the truly central American power players — including Trump-world and top tech billionaires — mostly issue carefully lawyered statements and continue on as if being in Epstein’s inner circle were nothing more than a bad photo from college.
That’s not an accident. That’s a system working exactly as it was redesigned to work: accountability for the expendable, insulation for the indispensable.
The American shield: wealth, power, and partisan armor
Let’s be blunt. In the United States, if you are rich enough, famous enough, or politically useful enough, the Trump-Epstein files are a reputational nuisance, not an existential threat. I don’t say that lightly.
The DOJ’s posture is the first line of protection. By framing the mass release as the end of its work — while under‑complying with a subpoena and dumping unredacted survivor names and intimate details — the Department has sent two messages at once: to victims, that their dignity is negotiable; to elites, that criminal exposure is essentially over. Survivors’ advocates are spelling this out: they’re furious that their personal data is spilled across public records while the identities, communications, and decisions of powerful men remain selectively hidden behind redactions and legal hair‑splitting.
Layered on top is partisan armor. In a hyper‑polarized environment, scandal is no longer a moral disruption; it’s content. Trump’s presidency accelerated a culture in which the right answer to any allegation is “they’re out to get us,” not “we need to clean house.” Cabinet picks with unresolved allegations around sexual misconduct or extreme behavior skate through because their primary qualification is loyalty, not character. If your base decides that all accountability efforts are “deep state” or “Democrat witch hunts,” then Epstein becomes just another talking point, not a red line.
And then there’s raw money. Wall Street and Big Law don’t just hire elite lawyers; they are elite lawyers. A Goldman Sachs general counsel can keep her job after a flood of emails and meeting logs with Epstein because the firm has already priced the reputational risk and decided that her utility outweighs the moral stain. Major media brands keep booking doctors and commentators who flirted with Epstein’s circle because the audience is large, the content is sticky, and the scandal can be framed as a youthful lapse in judgment instead of a flashing red light.
This isn’t a few bad apples. It’s a shield wall.
Cowards and traitors to justice
I’m going to use words most columnists dodge: many of the people holding that shield wall are cowards and traitors to justice.
Cowards, because they know exactly what they are doing. They’ve read enough of the files to understand that Epstein’s world was not some eccentric philanthropy salon but an industrialized system of exploitation and trafficking. They see the same patterns victims and investigators see: the grooming, the flights, the recruitment pipelines, the pressure campaigns on prosecutors. And yet, when the question becomes “Do we fire this person? Do we open this inquiry? Do we risk this donor’s wrath?” they flinch.
Traitors to justice, because their first loyalty is not to the rule of law or to survivors but to their own access, their own careers, their own party’s grip on power. When House Oversight’s top Democrat says flatly that “the DOJ cannot be trusted” on this and that the White House has treated the issue as a cover‑up from day one, he’s articulating what many already suspect: the system is more invested in limiting damage than in telling the full truth. When the DOJ releases files in ways that re‑traumatize victims and protect elites, that’s not just a technical mistake — it’s a moral choice.
I know some will object: “But some people did pay a price.” That’s true. Summers, Mandelson, a law‑firm chair, a museum director — these are not nobodies. Yet look at the pattern: the system coughs up a few high‑profile sacrifices and then uses them as proof that “the process works,” while the deeper network of relationships, favors, and omissions remains intact.
If your metric of justice is “did a few people fall?”, then yes, we can all go home. If your metric is “did the structure that allowed Epstein to thrive actually change?”, the answer so far is no.
There will be a reckoning
I don’t believe this equilibrium is stable. You can’t keep telling a country that there are two parallel justice systems — one of brutal exposure for victims and expendable functionaries, another of quiet impunity for presidents, princes, billionaires, and their fixers — and expect the public to accept it indefinitely.
The reckoning, if it comes, probably won’t look like a Hollywood-style perp walk of the most famous names in the files. It’s more likely to come through three pressure points:
- Persistent democratic scrutiny.
The fight over the remaining Trump-Epstein files is not over. Members of Congress are already preparing contempt actions, new subpoenas, and legislative fixes to force full disclosure. Every delay, every selective release, every obvious redaction that protects the powerful adds to a paper trail future prosecutors, historians, and truth commissions can use. - International embarrassment.
The more Europe purges its Epstein‑tainted elites, the more grotesque America’s non‑response will look by comparison. When Norway is launching criminal probes and Britain is contemplating the downfall of a prime minister over judgment about an Epstein‑linked ambassador, it becomes harder for the U.S. to insist that “there’s nothing more to see here.” - Cultural shift among the non‑elite.
Survivors and ordinary citizens are not confused about what they’re seeing. They understand that a DOJ which can painstakingly redact inter‑agency email chains to protect reputations but “accidentally” leave victims’ personal data exposed is not a neutral arbiter. When enough people internalize the idea that the current elite are not guardians of order but obstacles to justice, the ground under those elites starts to move.
That’s what I mean when I say there will be a reckoning and it will come in the night. It may be a future Congress with a different balance of power that reopens the files and names names. It may be state‑level prosecutors digging where federal authorities refused to. It may be a cascade of leaks from inside institutions that are sick of being part of the cover‑up. But the idea that this all ends with a single DOJ press conference and a few tearful resignations is fantasy.
And when the real break comes, it will not surprise the people who’ve been watching closely. The only people it will shock are the ones who convinced themselves that their proximity to money, to presidents, to big law firms and global banks, made them untouchable.
Justice, if we mean it, has to be non‑negotiable
If we’re serious about justice — not the slogan, but the real thing — then the Epstein saga has to become a turning point, not just a grotesque chapter we live with.
That means:
- Full file release, with real redaction standards: protect survivors, not power brokers.
- Independent review of DOJ’s handling, including the original sweetheart deals and the current slow‑walk of transparency.
- Clear professional consequences for officials, lawyers, bankers, and media figures who traded on Epstein’s network after it was obvious who and what he was — even if their conduct stops short of criminality.
- A political culture that stops letting partisanship turn every demand for accountability into a tribal attack and starts treating abuse of the vulnerable as a bright line that no team jersey can excuse.
I don’t write any of this as a detached observer. I’m angry. I’m angry that victims’ privacy was collateral damage while elites’ comfort remains a policy objective. I’m angry that Europe, for all its flaws, is at least showing us what consequences can look like, while America’s most powerful shrug and tell us the book is closed.
But anger isn’t enough. The reckoning you and I are talking about doesn’t happen automatically. It happens when enough people refuse to accept the narrative that wealth and status equal immunity. It happens when we stop treating cowardice as savvy and start naming it for what it is.
Until then, yes — they’re getting a pass. And every day that passes, the bill they’re running up with history gets bigger.
Create Your Own Website With Webador